Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験勉強書 & Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate資格準備
さらに、Topexam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associateダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1k1JW6sdyYIatbK1uendXImaKmDe3NVMW
Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験に問題がある場合は、無料のデモを検討してください。弊社の最新のDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験トレントは、この業界では完璧な模範であり、さまざまな程度の試験受験者向けの明確なコンテンツに満ちています。最新のDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験トレントの結果は驚くほど驚くべきもので、試験受験者の98％以上が目標を無事に達成しました。また、Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associateテストダンプにより、あらゆる種類の教材の精度が非常に高いことが保証されました。
あなたはまだ試験について心配していますか？ 心配しないで！Topexam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験トレントは、作業または学習プロセス中にこの障害を克服するのに役立ちます。 Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associateテスト準備の指示の下で、非常に短時間でタスクを完了し、間違いなく試験に合格してDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate証明書を取得できます。 Databricksサービスをさまざまな個人に合わせて調整し、わずか20〜30時間の練習とトレーニングの後、目的の試験に参加できるようにします。 さらに、理論と内容に関してDatabricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associateクイズトレントを毎日更新する専門家がいます。
>> Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験勉強書 <<
Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験勉強書: Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate - Topexam 有効なオファー 資格準備
DatabricksのDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate認定試験を一回合格するためには必ず良い準備しなければなりません。完全な知識がこの高度専門の試験に合格するのは必要でTopexamは君にこれらの資源を完全な需要に備わっています。
Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate 認定試験の出題範囲：
トピック
出題範囲
トピック 1
トピック 2
トピック 3
トピック 4
トピック 5
Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate 認定 Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate 試験問題 (Q23-Q28):
質問 # 23
A Generative AI Engineer is designing an LLM-powered live sports commentary platform. The platform provides real-time updates and LLM-generated analyses for any users who would like to have live summaries, rather than reading a series of potentially outdated news articles.
Which tool below will give the platform access to real-time data for generating game analyses based on the latest game scores?
正解：C
解説：
* Problem Context: The engineer is developing an LLM-powered live sports commentary platform that needs to provide real-time updates and analyses based on the latest game scores. The critical requirement here is the capability to access and integrate real-time data efficiently with the platform for immediate analysis and reporting.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: DatabricksIQ: While DatabricksIQ offers integration and data processing capabilities, it is more aligned with data analytics rather than real-time feature serving, which is crucial for immediate updates necessary in a live sports commentary context.
* Option B: Foundation Model APIs: These APIs facilitate interactions with pre-trained models and could be part of the solution, but on their own, they do not provide mechanisms to access real- time game scores.
* Option C: Feature Serving: This is the correct answer as feature serving specifically refers to the real-time provision of data (features) to models for prediction. This would be essential for an LLM that generates analyses based on live game data, ensuring that the commentary is current and based on the latest events in the sport.
* Option D: AutoML: This tool automates the process of applying machine learning models to real-world problems, but it does not directly provide real-time data access, which is a critical requirement for the platform.
Thus,Option C(Feature Serving) is the most suitable tool for the platform as it directly supports the real-time data needs of an LLM-powered sports commentary system, ensuring that the analyses and updates are based on the latest available information.
質問 # 24
A Generative Al Engineer at an automotive company would like to build a question-answering chatbot for customers to inquire about their vehicles. They have a database containing various documents of different vehicle makes, their hardware parts, and common maintenance information.
Which of the following components will NOT be useful in building such a chatbot?
正解：B
解説：
The task involves building a question-answering chatbot for an automotive company using a database of vehicle-related documents. The chatbot must efficiently process customer inquiries and provide accurate responses. Let's evaluate each component to determine which isnotuseful, per Databricks Generative AI Engineer principles.
* Option A: Response-generating LLM
* An LLM is essential for generating natural language responses to customer queries based on retrieved information. This is a core component of any chatbot.
* Databricks Reference:"The response-generating LLM processes retrieved context to produce coherent answers"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks," 2023).
* Option B: Invite users to submit long, rather than concise, questions
* Encouraging long questions is a user interaction design choice, not a technical component of the chatbot's architecture. Moreover, long, verbose questions can complicate intent detection and retrieval, reducing efficiency and accuracy-counter to best practices for chatbot design. Concise questions are typically preferred for clarity and performance.
* Databricks Reference: While not explicitly stated, Databricks' "Generative AI Cookbook" emphasizes efficient query processing, implying that simpler, focused inputs improve LLM performance. Inviting long questions doesn't align with this.
* Option C: Vector database
* A vector database stores embeddings of the vehicle documents, enabling fast retrieval of relevant information via semantic search. This is critical for a question-answering system with a large document corpus.
* Databricks Reference:"Vector databases enable scalable retrieval of context from large datasets"("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: Embedding model
* An embedding model converts text (documents and queries) into vector representations for similarity search. It's a foundational component for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) in chatbots.
* Databricks Reference:"Embedding models transform text into vectors, facilitating efficient matching of queries to documents"("Building LLM-Powered Applications").
Conclusion: Option B is not a usefulcomponentin building the chatbot. It's a user-facing suggestion rather than a technical building block, and it could even degrade performance by introducing unnecessary complexity. Options A, C, and D are all integral to a Databricks-aligned chatbot architecture.
質問 # 25
A Generative Al Engineer is setting up a Databricks Vector Search that will lookup news articles by topic within 10 days of the date specified An example query might be "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th 1992". They want to do this with the least amount of effort.
How can they set up their Vector Search index to support this use case?
正解：B
解説：
The task is to set up a Databricks Vector Search index for news articles, supporting queries like "monster truck news around January 5th, 1992," with minimal effort. The index must filter by topic and a 10-day date range. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Split articles by 10-day blocks and return the block closest to the query
* Pre-splitting articles into 10-day blocks requires significant preprocessing and index management (e.g., one index per block). It's effort-intensive and inflexible for dynamic date ranges.
* Databricks Reference:"Static partitioning increases setup complexity; metadata filtering is preferred"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
* Option B: Include metadata columns for article date and topic to support metadata filtering
* Adding date and topic as metadata in the Vector Search index allows dynamic filtering (e.g., date
± 5 days, topic = "monster truck") at query time. This leverages Databricks' built-in metadata filtering, minimizing setup effort.
* Databricks Reference:"Vector Search supports metadata filtering on columns like date or category for precise retrieval with minimal preprocessing"("Vector Search Guide," 2023).
* Option C: Pass the query directly to the vector search index and return the best articles
* Passing the full query (e.g., "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th, 1992") to Vector Search relies solely on embeddings, ignoring structured filtering for date and topic. This risks inaccurate results without explicit range logic.
* Databricks Reference:"Pure vector similarity may not handle temporal or categorical constraints effectively"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option D: Create separate indexes by topic and add a classifier model to appropriately pick the best index
* Separate indexes per topic plus a classifier model adds significant complexity (index creation, model training, maintenance), far exceeding "least effort." It's overkill for this use case.
* Databricks Reference:"Multiple indexes increase overhead; single-index with metadata is simpler"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
Conclusion: Option B is the simplest and most effective solution, using metadata filtering in a single Vector Search index to handle date ranges and topics, aligning with Databricks' emphasis on efficient, low-effort setups.
質問 # 26
A Generative AI Engineer is designing an LLM-powered live sports commentary platform. The platform provides real-time updates and LLM-generated analyses for any users who would like to have live summaries, rather than reading a series of potentially outdated news articles.
Which tool below will give the platform access to real-time data for generating game analyses based on the latest game scores?
正解：C
解説：
* Problem Context: The engineer is developing an LLM-powered live sports commentary platform that needs to provide real-time updates and analyses based on the latest game scores. The critical requirement here is the capability to access and integrate real-time data efficiently with the platform for immediate analysis and reporting.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: DatabricksIQ: While DatabricksIQ offers integration and data processing capabilities, it is more aligned with data analytics rather than real-time feature serving, which is crucial for immediate updates necessary in a live sports commentary context.
* Option B: Foundation Model APIs: These APIs facilitate interactions with pre-trained models and could be part of the solution, but on their own, they do not provide mechanisms to access real- time game scores.
* Option C: Feature Serving: This is the correct answer as feature serving specifically refers to the real-time provision of data (features) to models for prediction. This would be essential for an LLM that generates analyses based on live game data, ensuring that the commentary is current and based on the latest events in the sport.
* Option D: AutoML: This tool automates the process of applying machine learning models to real-world problems, but it does not directly provide real-time data access, which is a critical requirement for the platform.
Thus,Option C(Feature Serving) is the most suitable tool for the platform as it directly supports the real-time data needs of an LLM-powered sports commentary system, ensuring that the analyses and updates are based on the latest available information.
質問 # 27
After changing the response generating LLM in a RAG pipeline from GPT-4 to a model with a shorter context length that the company self-hosts, the Generative AI Engineer is getting the following error:
What TWO solutions should the Generative AI Engineer implement without changing the response generating model? (Choose two.)
正解：B、D
解説：
* Problem Context: After switching to a model with a shorter context length, the error message indicating that the prompt token count has exceeded the limit suggests that the input to the model is too large.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Use a smaller embedding model to generate- This wouldn't necessarily address the issue of prompt size exceeding the model's token limit.
* Option B: Reduce the maximum output tokens of the new model- This option affects the output length, not the size of the input being too large.
* Option C: Decrease the chunk size of embedded documents- This would help reduce the size of each document chunk fed into the model, ensuring that the input remains within the model's context length limitations.
* Option D: Reduce the number of records retrieved from the vector database- By retrieving fewer records, the total input size to the model can be managed more effectively, keeping it within the allowable token limits.
* Option E: Retrain the response generating model using ALiBi- Retraining the model is contrary to the stipulation not to change the response generating model.
OptionsCandDare the most effective solutions to manage the model's shorter context length without changing the model itself, by adjusting the input size both in terms of individual document size and total documents retrieved.
質問 # 28
......
IT業種は急激に発展しているこの時代で、IT専門家を称賛しなければならないです。彼らは自身が持っている先端技術で色々な便利を作ってくれます。それに、会社に大量な人的·物的資源を節約させると同時に、案外のうまい効果を取得しました。彼らの給料は言うまでもなく高いです。そのような人になりたいのですか。羨ましいですか。心配することはないです。TopexamのDatabricksのDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associateトレーニング資料はあなたに期待するものを与えますから。Topexamを選ぶのは、成功を選ぶということになります。
Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate資格準備: https://www.topexam.jp/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate_shiken.html
2025年Topexamの最新Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate PDFダンプおよびDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1k1JW6sdyYIatbK1uendXImaKmDe3NVMW
