Correct Valid Dumps ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Files & Pass-Sure PECB Certification Training - Verified PECB PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager
Using these PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager practice test software you will identify your mistakes, gain confidence and learn time-management skills. It will help you to prepare better for the final ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam. PDFDumps PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Dumps - Free Demo Download & Refund Guarantee PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam dumps are the best option if you really want to pass the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager exam on your first attempt.
PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Syllabus Topics:
Topic
Details
Topic 1
Topic 2
Topic 3
Topic 4
>> Valid Dumps ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Files <<
New Valid Dumps ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Files 100% Pass | Efficient ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Braindumps Ppt: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager
When dealing with any kind of exams, the most important thing is to find a scientific way to review effectively. Our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager practice materials compiled by the most professional experts. Till now, we have over tens of thousands of customers around the world supporting our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam torrent. If you are unfamiliar with our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Study Materials, please download the free demos for your reference. To some unlearned exam candidates, you can master necessities by our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager practice materials quickly So our materials are elemental materials you cannot miss.
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager Sample Questions (Q13-Q18):
NEW QUESTION # 13
Scenario 3: Printary is an American company that offers digital printing services. Creating cost-effective and creative products, the company has been part of the printing industry for more than 30 years. Three years ago, the company started to operate online, providing greater flexibility for its clients. Through the website, clients could find information about all services offered by Printary and order personalized products. However, operating online increased the risk of cyber threats, consequently, impacting the business functions of the company. Thus, along with the decision of creating an online business, the company focused on managing information security risks. Their risk management program was established based on ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines and industry best practices.
Last year, the company considered the integration of an online payment system on its website in order to provide more flexibility and transparency to customers. Printary analyzed various available solutions and selected Pay0, a payment processing solution that allows any company to easily collect payments on their website. Before making the decision, Printary conducted a risk assessment to identify and analyze information security risks associated with the software. The risk assessment process involved three phases: identification, analysis, and evaluation. During risk identification, the company inspected assets, threats, and vulnerabilities. In addition, to identify the information security risks, Printary used a list of the identified events that could negatively affect the achievement of information security objectives. The risk identification phase highlighted two main threats associated with the online payment system: error in use and data corruption After conducting a gap analysis, the company concluded that the existing security controls were sufficient to mitigate the threat of data corruption. However, the user interface of the payment solution was complicated, which could increase the risk associated with user errors, and, as a result, impact data integrity and confidentiality.
Subsequently, the risk identification results were analyzed. The company conducted risk analysis in order to understand the nature of the identified risks. They decided to use a quantitative risk analysis methodology because it would provide more detailed information. The selected risk analysis methodology was consistent with the risk evaluation criteri a. Firstly, they used a list of potential incident scenarios to assess their potential impact. In addition, the likelihood of incident scenarios was defined and assessed. Finally, the level of risk was defined as low.
In the end, the level of risk was compared to the risk evaluation and acceptance criteria and was prioritized accordingly.
Which of the following situations indicates that Printary identified consequences of risk scenarios? Refer to scenario 3.
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, the risk management process involves identifying, analyzing, and evaluating risks in a structured manner. Specifically, risk identification entails recognizing potential threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences to information assets. Once risks are identified, ISO/IEC 27005 emphasizes the importance of risk analysis, where risks are assessed in terms of their potential consequences and likelihood.
In the scenario, Printary followed this structured approach, aligning with the ISO/IEC 27005 framework. First, they identified the threats associated with the online payment system, which were categorized as user errors and data corruption. However, identification of threats alone does not equate to identifying the consequences of risk scenarios, as required by the risk analysis phase in ISO/IEC 27005.
The key to recognizing that Printary identified the consequences lies in the fact that they "used the list of potential incident scenarios and assessed their impact on the company's information security." This directly corresponds to ISO/IEC 27005's guidelines on risk analysis, where organizations must evaluate both the likelihood and the impact (consequences) of potential incidents on their assets. In other words, by assessing the impact of the incident scenarios, Printary is analyzing the consequences of the identified risks, which is a crucial step in the risk analysis process.
Option A refers to identifying a risk (user error leading to compromised data integrity and confidentiality), but this does not constitute a comprehensive analysis of the risk's consequences as per ISO/IEC 27005. Similarly, Option C highlights the identification of threats, but the threats themselves are not the consequences of risk scenarios.
Thus, Option B is the most accurate as it reflects Printary's alignment with ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines in assessing the potential consequences of risk scenarios by evaluating their impact on the company's information security.
NEW QUESTION # 14
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Based on scenario 6, Productscape decided to monitor the remaining risk after risk treatment. Is this necessary?
Answer: B
Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27005 advises that even after risks have been treated, any residual risks should be continuously monitored and reviewed. This is necessary to ensure that they remain within acceptable levels and that any changes in the internal or external environment do not escalate the risk beyond acceptable thresholds. Monitoring also ensures that the effectiveness of the controls remains adequate over time. Option A is incorrect because all risks, including those meeting the risk acceptance criteria, should be monitored. Option B is incorrect because monitoring is necessary regardless of the perceived severity if it occurs, to detect changes early.
NEW QUESTION # 15
Scenario 8: Biotide is a pharmaceutical company that produces medication for treating different kinds of diseases. The company was founded in 1997, and since then it has contributed in solving some of the most challenging healthcare issues.
As a pharmaceutical company, Biotide operates in an environment associated with complex risks. As such, the company focuses on risk management strategies that ensure the effective management of risks to develop high-quality medication. With the large amount of sensitive information generated from the company, managing information security risks is certainly an important part of the overall risk management process. Biotide utilizes a publicly available methodology for conducting risk assessment related to information assets. This methodology helps Biotide to perform risk assessment by taking into account its objectives and mission. Following this method, the risk management process is organized into four activity areas, each of them involving a set of activities, as provided below.
1. Activity area 1: The organization determines the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated. In addition, the impacts of risks are also defined.
2. Activity area 2: The purpose of the second activity area is to create information asset profiles. The organization identifies critical information assets, their owners, as well as the security requirements for those assets. After determining the security requirements, the organization prioritizes them. In addition, the organization identifies the systems that store, transmit, or process information.
3. Activity area 3: The organization identifies the areas of concern which initiates the risk identification process. In addition, the organization analyzes and determines the probability of the occurrence of possible threat scenarios.
4. Activity area 4: The organization identifies and evaluates the risks. In addition, the criteria specified in activity area 1 is reviewed and the consequences of the areas of concerns are evaluated. Lastly, the level of identified risks is determined.
The table below provides an example of how Biotide assesses the risks related to its information assets following this methodology:
Based on the table provided in scenario 8, did Biotide follow all the steps of the risk assessment methodology regarding the identification of assets?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Based on the scenario, Biotide follows a methodology where the identification of critical assets is part of Activity Area 2. However, according to ISO/IEC 27005, after identifying the critical assets, the organization should also identify and document the asset owners.
ISO/IEC 27005:2018 emphasizes that the asset owner is responsible for the protection of the asset and that understanding ownership is critical to implementing effective risk management controls. In the given table, the scenario does not explicitly mention defining the asset owners after identifying critical assets, which is a necessary step. Therefore, the correct answer is B.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Section 7.2.2 "Identification of assets, owners, and risk sources" details the steps required for proper asset identification, including defining the asset owners as a critical part of the risk assessment process.
NEW QUESTION # 16
Scenario 2: Travivve is a travel agency that operates in more than 100 countries. Headquartered in San Francisco, the US, the agency is known for its personalized vacation packages and travel services. Travivve aims to deliver reliable services that meet its clients' needs. Considering the impact of information security in its reputation, Travivve decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001. In addition, they decided to establish and implement an information security risk management program. Based on the priority of specific departments in Travivve, the top management decided to initially apply the risk management process only in the Sales Management Department. The process would be applicable for other departments only when introducing new technology.
Travivve's top management wanted to make sure that the risk management program is established based on the industry best practices. Therefore, they created a team of three members that would be responsible for establishing and implementing it. One of the team members was Travivve's risk manager who was responsible for supervising the team and planning all risk management activities. In addition, the risk manager was responsible for monitoring the program and reporting the monitoring results to the top management.
Initially, the team decided to analyze the internal and external context of Travivve. As part of the process of understanding the organization and its context, the team identified key processes and activities. Then, the team identified the interested parties and their basic requirements and determined the status of compliance with these requirements. In addition, the team identified all the reference documents that applied to the defined scope of the risk management process, which mainly included the Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 and the internal security rules established by Travivve. Lastly, the team analyzed both reference documents and justified a few noncompliances with those requirements.
The risk manager selected the information security risk management method which was aligned with other approaches used by the company to manage other risks. The team also communicated the risk management process to all interested parties through previously established communication mechanisms. In addition, they made sure to inform all interested parties about their roles and responsibilities regarding risk management. Travivve also decided to involve interested parties in its risk management activities since, according to the top management, this process required their active participation.
Lastly, Travivve's risk management team decided to conduct the initial information security risk assessment process. As such, the team established the criteria for performing the information security risk assessment which included the consequence criteria and likelihood criteria.
Did the risk management team establish all the criteria required to perform the information security risk assessment? Refer to scenario 2.
Answer: A
Explanation:
While Travivve's risk management team established criteria for consequence and likelihood, ISO/IEC 27005 requires that additional criteria should be defined to complete a risk assessment. Specifically, the team should also establish criteria for determining the level of risk, which involves combining the likelihood and consequence to evaluate risk magnitude. This step is crucial for prioritizing risks and determining which risks require treatment. The absence of criteria for determining the level of risk means that the team did not fully meet the requirements of ISO/IEC 27005 for performing an information security risk assessment. Therefore, the correct answer is A.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.4, "Risk Assessment," which outlines the need to establish criteria for risk acceptance, which includes determining the level of risk.
NEW QUESTION # 17
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Which risk treatment option was used for the second risk scenario? Refer to scenario 6.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Risk sharing, also known as risk transfer, involves sharing the risk with another party, such as through insurance or outsourcing certain activities to third-party vendors. In Scenario 6, Productscape decided to contract an IT company to provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks to prevent incidents related to the second risk scenario (gaining access to confidential information and threatening to make it public unless a ransom is paid). This is an example of risk sharing because Productscape transferred part of the risk management responsibilities to an external company. Thus, the correct answer is C, Risk sharing.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which includes risk sharing as an option where a third party is used to manage specific risks.
NEW QUESTION # 18
......
With the development of information and communications technology, we are now living in a globalized world. ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager information technology learning is correspondingly popular all over the world. Modern technology has changed the way how we live and work. In current situation, enterprises and institutions require their candidates not only to have great education background, but also acquired professional ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Certification. Considering that, it is no doubt that an appropriate certification would help candidates achieve higher salaries and get promotion.
ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Braindumps Ppt: https://www.pdfdumps.com/ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager-valid-exam.html
